Saturday, January 11, 2014

Basic Security Theorem, Step 2

      If a system is initially in a secure state, and every transition of the system satisfies the simple security condition, step 2, and the *-property, step 2, then every state of the system is secure

    Proof: induct on the number of transitions

    In actual Basic Security Theorem, discretionary access control treated as third property, and simple security property and *-property phrased to eliminate discretionary part of the definitions — but simpler to express the way done here.

Problem

      Colonel has (Secret, {NUC, EUR}) clearance

      Major has (Secret, {EUR}) clearance

   Major can talk to colonel (“write up” or “read down”)

   Colonel cannot talk to major (“read up” or “write down”)

      Clearly absurd!

Solution

      Define maximum, current levels for subjects

    maxlevel(s) dom curlevel(s)

      Example

    Treat Major as an object (Colonel is writing to him/her)

    Colonel has maxlevel (Secret, { NUC, EUR })

    Colonel sets curlevel to (Secret, { EUR })

    Now L(Major) dom curlevel(Colonel)

    Colonel can write to Major without violating “no writes down”

    Does L(s) mean curlevel(s) or maxlevel(s)?

    Formally, we need a more precise notation


No comments:

Post a Comment